15 Comments
User's avatar
Chintan Zalani's avatar

I really like this system. How do you fact check here though...is there any layer to help catch hallucinations? I would love to know!

Expand full comment
Jonas Braadbaart's avatar

I'm asking the AI systems to summarize and grounding their response with the article content. Summarization is a different beast from any kind of speculative thinking (which I still do myself).

So far I haven't seen any weird behavior - when there is no content for the article in the RSS feed for example (roughly 1 in 15 articles), the summaries will just say "there was no text for the article".

Expand full comment
Chintan Zalani's avatar

That makes sense. Thanks for sharing Jonas!

Expand full comment
Wyndo's avatar

thanks for the shout out Jonas.

we actually have similar workflow where I also process and synthesize everything on Claude Code through my Gdocs while make.com is doing all of information gathering!

I'm currently experimenting to build small app inside my Claude Code project to visualize every content I have published on my newsletter so I can monitor them religiously and use custom command every once in awhile to ask Claude to update all the data.

Thanks for sharing this, love it!

Expand full comment
Jonas Braadbaart's avatar

That's a great idea! I'm still manually curating the Claude code examples, happy with that for now

The one thing I'm missing in this setup is quantitative data - number of likes, reads etc

Would be interesting for additional insights

Expand full comment
Juan Salas-Romer's avatar

This is fantastic, Jonas. Clear, structured, and incredibly actionable. I like how you combined Make.com for scalable capture with Claude and Gemini for layered intelligence. The balance between automation and editorial control really stands out

Expand full comment
Ruben Hassid's avatar

Five euros for a compounding insight engine is a steal!!

Expand full comment
Luis Llorens's avatar

interesting! Thanks for sharing

Expand full comment
Dennis Berry's avatar

That cartoon is Hilarious!! 🤣

So we don’t write OR read any of the content we stress so much over

Expand full comment
John Brewton's avatar

Love the honesty here. Automation works best when it’s in service of insight, not noise.

Expand full comment
Sara & Diandra's avatar

Genius!! You'd be a terrific guest for one of our next issues.

Expand full comment
Mike Watson's avatar

Very cool! I would pay to subscribe/consume this kind of aggregation.

Expand full comment
Jonas Braadbaart's avatar

Ah really? What kind of insights are you looking for?

Expand full comment
Mike Watson's avatar

I try to factor in what’s performing well in other newsletters content wise into what I might write about in the coming month. It might be a content strategy type play.

Expand full comment
Jonas Braadbaart's avatar

Right! Yeah for that you'd need more than this setup - you'd also need the analytics data on what's performing well

This is more for ideation and spotting trends as they're evolving (although you can definitely also use it for trend hacking because of that)

Expand full comment